The Greatest Truth Denies Nothing

This is a saying that one should come to know if they are a seeker in truth. Apocalyptic natures means to reveal, or of the great reveal.

To revel in the reveal is to have a revelation with new found knowledge and to look back in hindsight to understand the connections of the differences between what once was thought and what we ‘know’ ‘now’ to be ‘true’.

What you once thought true, is not a lie, it is contained in the grander truth.

The greater a truth is, the more it includes and not excludes. So the perspectives of both sides are contained within the greater truth. Thus the greatest truth denies nothing, instead it encompasses everything.

Philosophers tried to do alchemy with truth, combining and formulating truth from using conflicting viewpoints to rationalize a greater truth. This is a tricky task.

This form of alchemy of truth is called Syllogism and was used in Hegelian Dialectics.

Essentially taking a thesis, and it’s counter or anti-thesis and formulating a new combination thesis that encompasses both.

“Hegelian dialectic is a form of syllogism”

Syllogism meaning combinational logic. Here’s a definition from the internet;

an instance of a form of reasoning in which a conclusion is drawn (whether validly or not) from two given or assumed propositions (premises), each of which shares a term with the conclusion, and shares a common or middle term not present in the conclusion (e.g., all dogs are animals; all animals have four legs; therefore all dogs have four legs ).

Again, this may not lead to truth, it can be inaccurate itself, but it may lead to the greater truth. There are problems and nuances when trying to discover the greatest truth, and it’s not often linear. Truth is not often linear like the lines in a logic statement or a sentence.

We know for a fact

That we exist, and if we exist and can conceptualize what truth is. Then the idea that truth exists is true. Now the tricky part is to discern whether truth actually exists objectively. But Subjectively, Truth does exist as we are the observers, the judges, and we are the object that subjects things to be true or not. The watcher and listener, we are that, that which observes and judges.

If truth exists, and there are varying degrees of accuracy, then the greater the truth, the more accurate or precise it is.

This greater truth will encompass all sides and all stories, and even accurately depict truthfully the lies and deception laid by others. To be truth, it must be true.

Thus, the greatest truth will be akin to an instance or a story that describes succinctly in the greatest detail from the start of the universe to the end. From the farmer in the rice patty fields to the aristocratic noble performing a routine function at a political endowed ball. -Whether that be from the 17th century or from the 21st century, all would be included-

Perhaps it is one word (instead of a long story), and the word is only present in presence in the Here and Now permeating throughout all time and space. That word, that logos, that greatest truth, would be akin to the biblical god in the beginning, source, or all that is.

The Universe.

Epilogue,

I just wanted to say that if you are a truth seeker then you must delve for greater and lesser truths and determine what is the most encompassing truth to be true. What accounts for all stories and alibis and has a perfect clockwork of story for each cog in the machine. A perfect place for every face, a perfect time and space for each being to simply exist and interact with everything that is interconnected.

This also applies to science, logic, deductive and inductive reasoning, recipes, health, and more.

What is simple turns to be true in some cases when using Ockham’s Razer. Yet the simple truths have to be true in all cases for it to be truly true, if not then it’s a generalization. Thus the truth becomes a bit more complexed and nuanced than a generalization.

Old theories that were ‘debunked’ can be explained and incorporated into new theories. That would make the theory a better theory. To discredit or write off a theory as an anomaly does not sufficiently help us closer to real truth or a unified theory. To do so, means our theories are predicated on holes and flaws and we build a scaffolding of unstable thinking from unstable and non-all-encompassing theories. Scientific or otherwise.

Words Mean Things, and truth is a word that most definitely means something. Hopefully you’re seeking truth in a world that is littered with lies. And hopefully you notice that to lie, you need to know something that it’s based on to lie, therefore there is always a cosmic string of truth connected to every lie. Truth is embedded in a lie, or the lie is based off of a lie, which eventually was based off of a truth, or a misconception or misperception.